[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16905230#comment-16905230
 ] 

Benedict commented on CASSANDRA-15194:
--------------------------------------

bq. While we're here, should we consider renaming median to 50th, so it sorts 
correctly wrt 99th? For consistency I'd love to see 100th, but this would mess 
with order. It might be clearer to name them p50, p99, though, so we can also 
introduce p999 and maintain sort order.

I realise this was really unclear, but I ended up suggesting p50, p99 etc as 
names, so that if we introduce p999 it makes sense (though I guess we could 
always call it 99.9th, and this should sort correctly still)

Not essential, just making sure my lack of clarity wasn't obscuring the 
discussion.

LGTM, +1 either way

> Improve readability of Table metrics Virtual tables units
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-15194
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15194
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Feature/Virtual Tables
>            Reporter: Jon Haddad
>            Assignee: Chris Lohfink
>            Priority: Normal
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>
> I just noticed this strange output in the coordinator_reads output::
> {code}
> cqlsh:system_views> select * from coordinator_reads ;
>  count | keyspace_name      | table_name                     | 99th | max | 
> median | per_second
> -------+--------------------+--------------------------------+------+-----+--------+------------
>   7573 |         tlp_stress |                       keyvalue |    0 |   0 |   
>    0 | 2.2375e-16
>   6076 |         tlp_stress |                  random_access |    0 |   0 |   
>    0 | 7.4126e-12
>    390 |         tlp_stress |                sensor_data_udt |    0 |   0 |   
>    0 | 1.7721e-64
>     30 |             system |                          local |    0 |   0 |   
>    0 |   0.006406
>     11 |      system_schema |                        columns |    0 |   0 |   
>    0 | 1.1192e-16
>     11 |      system_schema |                        indexes |    0 |   0 |   
>    0 | 1.1192e-16
>     11 |      system_schema |                         tables |    0 |   0 |   
>    0 | 1.1192e-16
>     11 |      system_schema |                          views |    0 |   0 |   
>    0 | 1.1192e-16
> {code}
> cc [~cnlwsu]
> btw I realize the output is technically correct, but it's not very readable.  
> For practical purposes this should just say 0.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to