[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16954592#comment-16954592
 ] 

Benedict Elliott Smith commented on CASSANDRA-15363:
----------------------------------------------------

The patch LGTM.  I've done my best to guarantee we cannot erroneously produce a 
row marker in 3.0:

[here|https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/665f74740ce48bf476a9941793d44d9c588eca3c/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/db/RowUpdateBuilder.java#L89]
 we guarantee only to produce row markers for CQL3 tables, which is defined as 
excluding static compact tables 
[here|https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/fc862e207b04ed92f15b2129ae7738186ebc6d69/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/config/CFMetaData.java#L1172]

However, in 2.1 we _seem_ to be able to 
[here|https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/64d8a1d9fdacf3e7396cdf2f5c61171c1c9bccf2/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/cql3/statements/SelectStatement.java#L940],
 and nowhere else.  It seems to be an oversight that we do so here, as all 
other commentary and location rule out doing so.  Since this is only on 
_select_, I don't think any problematic scenario can arise that wouldn't 
already be covered by the patch.

Marcus has also experimentally tried to produce such a row marker in a 
mixed-mode cluster and failed to do so.  So I think we're OK in that respect.

However, I do wonder if it would be worth being ultra paranoid and modifying 
{{LegacyLayout.fromRow}} to simply never convert any row deletion into a range 
tombstone for compact tables, since they make no sense - a compact table row 
deletion is equivalent to a cell deletion.

> Read repair in mixed mode between 2.1 and 3.0 on COMPACT STORAGE tables 
> causes unreadable sstables after upgrade
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-15363
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15363
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Consistency/Coordination
>            Reporter: Marcus Eriksson
>            Assignee: Marcus Eriksson
>            Priority: Normal
>             Fix For: 3.0.x, 3.11.x
>
>
> if we have a table like this:
> {{CREATE TABLE tbl (pk ascii, b boolean, v blob, PRIMARY KEY (pk)) WITH 
> COMPACT STORAGE}}
> with a cluster where node1 is 2.1 and node2 is 3.0 (during upgrade):
> * node2 coordinates a delete {{DELETE FROM tbl WHERE pk = 'something'}} which 
> node1 does not get
> * node1 coordinates a quorum read {{SELECT * FROM tbl WHERE id = 
> 'something'}} which causes a read repair
> * this makes node1 flush an sstable like this:
> {code}
> [
> {"key": "something",
>  "metadata": {"deletionInfo": 
> {"markedForDeleteAt":1571388944364000,"localDeletionTime":1571388944}},
>  "cells": [["b","b",1571388944364000,"t",1571388944],
>            ["v","v",1571388944364000,"t",1571388944]]}
> ]
> {code}
> (It has range tombstones which are covered by the partition deletion)
> Then, when we upgrade this node to 3.0 and try to read or run 
> upgradesstables, we get this:
> {code}
> ERROR [node1_CompactionExecutor:1] node1 2019-10-18 10:44:11,325 
> DebuggableThreadPoolExecutor.java:242 - Error in ThreadPoolExecutor
> java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: null
>       at 
> org.apache.cassandra.db.LegacyLayout.extractStaticColumns(LegacyLayout.java:779)
>  ~[dtest-3.0.19.jar:na]
>       at 
> org.apache.cassandra.io.sstable.SSTableSimpleIterator$OldFormatIterator.readStaticRow(SSTableSimpleIterator.java:120)
>  ~[dtest-3.0.19.jar:na]
>       at 
> org.apache.cassandra.io.sstable.SSTableIdentityIterator.<init>(SSTableIdentityIterator.java:57)
>  ~[dtest-3.0.19.jar:na]
>       at 
> org.apache.cassandra.io.sstable.format.big.BigTableScanner$KeyScanningIterator$1.initializeIterator(BigTableScanner.java:362)
>  ~[dtest-3.0.19.jar:na]
>       at 
> org.apache.cassandra.db.rows.LazilyInitializedUnfilteredRowIterator.maybeInit(LazilyInitializedUnfilteredRowIterator.java:48)
>  ~[dtest-3.0.19.jar:na]
>       at 
> org.apache.cassandra.db.rows.LazilyInitializedUnfilteredRowIterator.isReverseOrder(LazilyInitializedUnfilteredRowIterator.java:65)
>  ~[dtest-3.0.19.jar:na]
>       at 
> org.apache.cassandra.db.partitions.UnfilteredPartitionIterators$1.reduce(UnfilteredPartitionIterators.java:103)
>  ~[dtest-3.0.19.jar:na]
>       at 
> org.apache.cassandra.db.partitions.UnfilteredPartitionIterators$1.reduce(UnfilteredPartitionIterators.java:94)
>  ~[dtest-3.0.19.jar:na]
>       at 
> org.apache.cassandra.utils.MergeIterator$OneToOne.computeNext(MergeIterator.java:442)
>  ~[dtest-3.0.19.jar:na]
>       at 
> org.apache.cassandra.utils.AbstractIterator.hasNext(AbstractIterator.java:47) 
> ~[dtest-3.0.19.jar:na]
>       at 
> org.apache.cassandra.db.partitions.UnfilteredPartitionIterators$2.hasNext(UnfilteredPartitionIterators.java:144)
>  ~[dtest-3.0.19.jar:na]
>       at 
> org.apache.cassandra.db.transform.BasePartitions.hasNext(BasePartitions.java:92)
>  ~[dtest-3.0.19.jar:na]
>       at 
> org.apache.cassandra.db.compaction.CompactionIterator.hasNext(CompactionIterator.java:227)
>  ~[dtest-3.0.19.jar:na]
>       at 
> org.apache.cassandra.db.compaction.CompactionTask.runMayThrow(CompactionTask.java:190)
>  ~[dtest-3.0.19.jar:na]
>       at 
> org.apache.cassandra.utils.WrappedRunnable.run(WrappedRunnable.java:28) 
> ~[dtest-3.0.19.jar:na]
>       at 
> org.apache.cassandra.db.compaction.CompactionTask.executeInternal(CompactionTask.java:89)
>  ~[dtest-3.0.19.jar:na]
>       at 
> org.apache.cassandra.db.compaction.AbstractCompactionTask.execute(AbstractCompactionTask.java:61)
>  ~[dtest-3.0.19.jar:na]
>       at 
> org.apache.cassandra.db.compaction.CompactionManager$8.runMayThrow(CompactionManager.java:675)
>  ~[dtest-3.0.19.jar:na]
>       at 
> org.apache.cassandra.utils.WrappedRunnable.run(WrappedRunnable.java:28) 
> ~[dtest-3.0.19.jar:na]
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511) 
> ~[na:1.8.0_121]
>       at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) 
> ~[na:1.8.0_121]
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
>  ~[na:1.8.0_121]
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
>  [na:1.8.0_121]
>       at 
> org.apache.cassandra.concurrent.NamedThreadFactory.lambda$threadLocalDeallocator$0(NamedThreadFactory.java:83)
>  [dtest-3.0.19.jar:na]
>       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) ~[na:1.8.0_121]
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to