[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17040573#comment-17040573
]
David Capwell edited comment on CASSANDRA-15553 at 2/20/20 2:06 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, that complicates things a little bit, would need to think about it more.
was (Author: dcapwell):
That would be fine; min is still smaller than the max one seen, so that
wouldn't break the snapshot isolation.
> Preview repair should include sstables from finalized incremental repair
> sessions
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-15553
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15553
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Consistency/Repair
> Reporter: Marcus Eriksson
> Assignee: Marcus Eriksson
> Priority: Normal
> Fix For: 4.0-alpha
>
>
> When running a preview repair we currently grab all repaired sstables,
> problem is that we depend on compaction to move the sstables from pending to
> repaired so we might have different data marked repaired on different nodes.
> Including any sstables from finalized incremental repair sessions as repaired
> will solve this.
> Another problem is that validations don't start at exactly the same time on
> different nodes, so if an incremental repair finishes while the preview
> repair is running we might also validate the wrong repaired set. We should
> fail the preview repair if an intersecting incremental repair finishes during
> the preview repair.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org
