[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15666?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17073831#comment-17073831
 ] 

Sergio Bossa commented on CASSANDRA-15666:
------------------------------------------

[~jasonstack] your fix looks good, just left a few minor comments on the PR. 
Regarding the changes to the {{CompleteMessage}} exchange, I still think that'd 
be a win regardless if the race is fixed in a different way, as the current 
implementation makes it harder to reason about its correctness (which means it 
could be prone to other races), but I also understand we want to limit the 
scope of changes to 4.0, so not pushing hard for it.

> Race condition when completing stream sessions
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-15666
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15666
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Legacy/Streaming and Messaging
>            Reporter: Sergio Bossa
>            Assignee: ZhaoYang
>            Priority: Normal
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>
> {{StreamSession#prepareAsync()}} executes, as the name implies, 
> asynchronously from the IO thread: this opens up for race conditions between 
> the sending of the {{PrepareSynAckMessage}} and the call to 
> {{StreamSession#maybeCompleted()}}. I.e., the following could happen:
> 1) Node A sends {{PrepareSynAckMessage}} from the {{prepareAsync()}} thread.
> 2) Node B receives it and starts streaming.
> 3) Node A receives the streamed file and sends {{ReceivedMessage}}.
> 4) At this point, if this was the only file to stream, both nodes are ready 
> to close the session via {{maybeCompleted()}}, but:
> a) Node A will call it twice from both the IO thread and the thread at #1, 
> closing the session and its channels.
> b) Node B will attempt to send a {{CompleteMessage}}, but will fail because 
> the session has been closed in the meantime.
> There are other subtle variations of the pattern above, depending on the 
> order of concurrently sent/received messages.
> I believe the best fix would be to modify the message exchange so that:
> 1) Only the "follower" is allowed to send the {{CompleteMessage}}.
> 2) Only the "initiator" is allowed to close the session and its channels 
> after receiving the {{CompleteMessage}}.
> By doing so, the message exchange logic would be easier to reason about, 
> which is overall a win anyway.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to