[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17337296#comment-17337296
 ] 

Sam Tunnicliffe commented on CASSANDRA-16360:
---------------------------------------------

{quote}Do you think it is worth to make this part now or we should wait and 
make the full change later on?
{quote}

Personally, I would apply the YAGNI principle and defer the work until I was 
ready to start one of the pieces which actually requires it. That said, if you 
have a surplus of free time and a burning desire to do it, I certainly wouldn't 
stand in your way :)

> CRC32 is inefficient on x86
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-16360
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16360
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Messaging/Client
>            Reporter: Avi Kivity
>            Assignee: Alexey Zotov
>            Priority: Normal
>              Labels: protocolv6
>             Fix For: 4.x
>
>
> The client/server protocol specifies CRC24 and CRC32 as the checksum 
> algorithm (cql_protocol_V5_framing.asc). Those however are expensive to 
> compute; this affects both the client and the server.
>  
> A better checksum algorithm is CRC32C, which has hardware support on x86 (as 
> well as other modern architectures).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to