[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17380702#comment-17380702 ]
Andres de la Peña commented on CASSANDRA-16621: ----------------------------------------------- This doesn't change that we still have to decide whether to use {{spinAssertEquals}} or {{Awaitility}}, but it's nice to use the same implementation for both methods. I guess that the criteria would be using {{spinAssertEquals}} when possible, and reserve the direct call to {{Awaitility}} for those cases in which more flexibility is required? Regarding the poll interval, even though 1ms is probably the most similar thing to the original implementation, I wonder whether it would be too low. Perhaps we could use Awaitility's default interval of 100ms and then add an optimistic poll delay of zero? > Replace spinAsserts code with Awaitility code > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: CASSANDRA-16621 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16621 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Test/unit > Reporter: Berenguer Blasi > Assignee: Jogesh Anand > Priority: Normal > Labels: low-hanging-fruit > Fix For: 4.0.x > > > Currently spinAsserts does a similar thing to Awaitility which is being used > more and more. We have now 2 ways of doing the same thing so it would be good > to consolidate -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org