[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17381622#comment-17381622
]
Jogesh Anand edited comment on CASSANDRA-16621 at 7/16/21, 3:55 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
+1 [~adelapena] - It does seem that fibonacci wouldn't work here. I implicitly
assumed that Awaitility would check the condition right before timeout, but
that's clearly not the case.
Updated to use a fixed poll interval of ~100ms in the PR.
Thanks [~bereng] for sharing.
was (Author: djanand):
+1 [~adelapena] - It does seem that fibonacci wouldn't work here. I implicitly
assumed that Awaitility would check the condition right before timeout, but
that's clearly not the case.
Updated to use a fixed poll interval of ~100ms in the PR.
> Replace spinAsserts code with Awaitility code
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-16621
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16621
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Test/unit
> Reporter: Berenguer Blasi
> Assignee: Jogesh Anand
> Priority: Normal
> Labels: low-hanging-fruit
> Fix For: 4.0.x
>
>
> Currently spinAsserts does a similar thing to Awaitility which is being used
> more and more. We have now 2 ways of doing the same thing so it would be good
> to consolidate
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org
