[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17401880#comment-17401880 ]
Sumanth Pasupuleti commented on CASSANDRA-16203: ------------------------------------------------ I was just curious if we needed a CEP, but I do agree, given that the strategy is pluggable, we should be fine without a CEP. > Rack Aware Topology Strategy > ---------------------------- > > Key: CASSANDRA-16203 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16203 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Cluster/Membership > Reporter: Cameron Zemek > Assignee: Cameron Zemek > Priority: Normal > Fix For: 4.x > > Attachments: rackaware.patch > > > If replication factor > racks then NetworkTopologyStrategy assigns the extras > in ring order. This means losing a rack can result in the loss of quorum. I > have implemented a similar topology strategy that evenly distributes replicas > across racks. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org