[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-17187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17486664#comment-17486664
 ] 

Andres de la Peña commented on CASSANDRA-17187:
-----------------------------------------------

There was an old patch by [~Gerrrr] for this, I'll post it here as soon as I 
adapt it to the last changes.

> Guardrail for SELECT IN terms and their cartesian product
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-17187
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-17187
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Feature/Guardrails
>            Reporter: Andres de la Peña
>            Priority: Normal
>              Labels: AdventCalendar2021, lhf
>             Fix For: 4.x
>
>
> Add a guardrail to limit the number restrictions generated by the cartesian 
> product of the {{IN}} restrictions of a {{SELECT}} query, for example:
> {code}
> # Guardrail to warn or abort when IN query creates a cartesian product with a 
> # size exceeding threshold, eg. "a in (1,2,...10) and b in (1,2...10)" 
> results in 
> # cartesian product of 100.
> # The two thresholds default to -1 to disable. 
> in_select_cartesian_product:
>     warn_threshold: -1
>     abort_threshold: -1
> {code}
> As an example of why this guardrails is proposed, these queries bring a C* 
> instance to its knees even before the query starts executing: 
> {code}
> @Test
> public void testPartitionKeyTerms() throws Throwable
> {
>     createTable("CREATE TABLE %s (pk1 int, pk2 int, pk3 int, pk4 int, pk5 
> int, pk6 int, pk7 int, pk8 int, pk9 int, " +
>                "PRIMARY KEY((pk1, pk2, pk3, pk4, pk5, pk6, pk7, pk8, pk9)))");
>     execute("SELECT * FROM %s WHERE pk1 in (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) " +
>             "AND pk2 in (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) " +
>             "AND pk3 in (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) " +
>             "AND pk4 in (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) " +
>             "AND pk5 in (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) " +
>             "AND pk6 in (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) " +
>             "AND pk7 in (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) " +
>             "AND pk8 in (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) " +
>             "AND pk9 in (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10);");
> }
> @Test
> public void testClusteringKeyTerms() throws Throwable
> {
>     createTable("CREATE TABLE %s (pk int ,ck1 int, ck2 int, ck3 int, ck4 int, 
> ck5 int, ck6 int, ck7 int, ck8 int, ck9 int, " +
>             "PRIMARY KEY(pk, ck1, ck2, ck3, ck4, ck5, ck6, ck7, ck8, ck9))");
>     execute("SELECT * FROM %s WHERE pk = 1 " +
>             "AND ck1 in (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) " +
>             "AND ck2 in (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) " +
>             "AND ck3 in (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) " +
>             "AND ck4 in (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) " +
>             "AND ck5 in (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) " +
>             "AND ck6 in (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) " +
>             "AND ck7 in (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) " +
>             "AND ck8 in (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) " +
>             "AND ck9 in (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10);");
> }
> {code}
> +Additional information for newcomers:+
> # Add the configuration for the new guardrail on cartesian product in the 
> guardrails section of cassandra.yaml.
> # Add a {{getInCartesianProduct}} method in {{GuardrailsConfig}} returning a 
> {{Threshold.Config}} object
> # Implement that method in {{GuardrailsOptions}}, which is the default 
> yaml-based implementation of {{GuardrailsConfig}}
> # Add a Threshold guardrail named {{inCartesianProduct}} in Guardrails, using 
> the previously created config
> # Define JMX-friendly getters and setters for the previously created config 
> in {{GuardrailsMBean}}
> # Implement the JMX-friendly getters and setters in Guardrails
> # Now that we have the guardrail ready, it’s time to use it. We should search 
> for a place to invoke the Guardrails#inCartesianProduct guard method. The 
> {{MultiCBuilder}} look like good candidates for this.
> # Finally, add some tests for the new guardrail. Given that the new guardrail 
> is a Threshold, our new test should probably extend {{ThresholdTester}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to