[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-17729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17563838#comment-17563838
]
Josh McKenzie commented on CASSANDRA-17729:
-------------------------------------------
bq. at the moment jenkins is our official CI so any bugs there need ironing
In my mind there's a distinction between a "test bug" and a "product bug". I
don't deny we have many of the former, but we may not agree on the relative
value of spending time fixing things that only show up in highly contended,
lowly provisioned test runtime environments.
Let's continue this discussion on the dev ML thread?
> Raise test timeouts
> -------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-17729
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-17729
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Test/unit
> Reporter: Berenguer Blasi
> Assignee: Berenguer Blasi
> Priority: Normal
> Fix For: 4.1-beta
>
>
> We have seen for some time now junits timeout frequently on jenkins. This is
> probably down to it being a very loaded env. On circle we don't observe that
> behavior probably bc it's not so loaded.
> The question is whether it is time to raise timeouts as they might be hiding
> legit failures. As en experiment I raised timeouts in a branch and ran
> jenkins against it. What I see is that the last 4.1 run had 14 failures out
> of which 12 were timeouts. Increasing timeouts reveals what looks to be 9
> legit failures where 2 are timeouts that probably need to be investigated.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org
