[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17619357#comment-17619357
 ] 

Berenguer Blasi edited comment on CASSANDRA-14227 at 10/18/22 9:58 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi,

I have been asked to run some profiling to see the impact 'longs' would have. I 
have tested on a single node doing inserts with a TTL + selects against that 
for 4m at around 100Kops/s after a warm up run. The results are virtual 
identical to both trunk and 14227 both at jfr and stress tool perf reporting

Trunk:

 !screenshot-1.png! 

14227

 !screenshot-2.png! 

If anything 14227's number are slightly better but probably just test env 
noise. GC pauses, total times, latencies, etc are all identical as well. The 
test CQL was:

{noformat}
CQL|INSERT INTO test.test (id, type, text) VALUES ($RANDOM_20000, $RANDOM_10, 
'TTL Profiling') USING TTL $RANDOM_500000
CQL|SELECT id, type, text FROM test.test WHERE id=$RANDOM_20000
{noformat}

where RANDOM_X means a random number up to X. Here we can see inserts, inserts 
colliding and selects. I will be happy to repeat the test if anybody has any 
suggestions. I am not posting the jfr for security reasons as the env vars 
section contains sensitive data (call me paranoid) but I can share them with 
known people on request. 

EDIT: I have been asked to confirm both runs are under 
{{memtable_allocation_type: heap_buffers}} so it is on heap.


was (Author: bereng):
Hi,

I have been asked to run some profiling to see the impact 'longs' would have. I 
have tested on a single node doing inserts with a TTL + selects against that 
for 4m at around 100Kops/s after a warm up run. The results are virtual 
identical to both trunk and 14227 both at jfr and stress tool perf reporting

Trunk:

 !screenshot-1.png! 

14227

 !screenshot-2.png! 

If anything 14227's number are slightly better but probably just test env 
noise. GC pauses, total times, latencies, etc are all identical as well. The 
test CQL was:

{noformat}
CQL|INSERT INTO test.test (id, type, text) VALUES ($RANDOM_20000, $RANDOM_10, 
'TTL Profiling') USING TTL $RANDOM_500000
CQL|SELECT id, type, text FROM test.test WHERE id=$RANDOM_20000
{noformat}

where RANDOM_X means a random number up to X. Here we can see inserts, inserts 
colliding and selects. I will be happy to repeat the test if anybody has any 
suggestions. I am not posting the jfr for security reasons as the env vars 
section contains sensitive data (call me paranoid) but I can share them with 
known people on request. 


> Extend maximum expiration date
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-14227
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14227
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Legacy/Local Write-Read Paths
>            Reporter: Paulo Motta (Deprecated)
>            Assignee: Berenguer Blasi
>            Priority: Urgent
>             Fix For: 4.x
>
>         Attachments: screenshot-1.png, screenshot-2.png
>
>
> The maximum expiration timestamp that can be represented by the storage 
> engine is
> 2038-01-19T03:14:06+00:00 due to the encoding of {{localExpirationTime}} as 
> an int32.
> On CASSANDRA-14092 we added an overflow policy which rejects requests with 
> expiration above the maximum date as a temporary measure, but we should 
> remove this limitation by updating the storage engine to support at least the 
> maximum allowed TTL of 20 years.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to