[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17677847#comment-17677847
 ] 

Andres de la Peña commented on CASSANDRA-14361:
-----------------------------------------------

Great, thanks. Looks good to me. Let's run CI once again for the last changes:

[https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/adelapena/cassandra/2551/workflows/9619bc5a-6d00-4107-a63d-a469eebff2db]

https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/adelapena/cassandra/2551/workflows/e77358f6-d9c2-4e16-877e-e69bd04a9d8d

> Allow SimpleSeedProvider to resolve multiple IPs per DNS name
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-14361
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14361
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Local/Config
>            Reporter: Ben Bromhead
>            Assignee: Stefan Miklosovic
>            Priority: Low
>             Fix For: 4.x
>
>          Time Spent: 1h 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Currently SimpleSeedProvider can accept a comma separated string of IPs or 
> hostnames as the set of Cassandra seeds. hostnames are resolved via 
> InetAddress.getByName, which will only return the first IP associated with an 
> A, AAAA or CNAME record.
> By changing to InetAddress.getAllByName, existing behavior is preserved, but 
> now Cassandra can discover multiple IP address per record, allowing seed 
> discovery by DNS to be a little easier.
> Some examples of improved workflows with this change include: 
>  * specify the DNS name of a headless service in Kubernetes which will 
> resolve to all IP addresses of pods within that service. 
>  * seed discovery for multi-region clusters via AWS route53, AzureDNS etc
>  * Other common DNS service discovery mechanisms.
> The only behavior this is likely to impact would be where users are relying 
> on the fact that getByName only returns a single IP address.
> I can't imagine any scenario where that is a sane choice. Even when that 
> choice has been made, it only impacts the first startup of Cassandra and 
> would not be on any critical path.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to