[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17707325#comment-17707325 ]
Jordan West commented on CASSANDRA-18352: ----------------------------------------- The newest run is much more green: [j8|https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/jrwest/cassandra/158/workflows/c10f7c56-3821-4f27-98e1-0664b1e9c73f] [j11 |https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/jrwest/cassandra/158/workflows/cf28afe3-b9f7-4f63-8f07-3c35af8398e2] > Add Option to Timebox write timestamps > -------------------------------------- > > Key: CASSANDRA-18352 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18352 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: CQL/Semantics > Reporter: Jordan West > Assignee: Jordan West > Priority: Normal > > In several cases it is desirable to have client provided timestamps generated > at the application-level. This can be error prone, however. In particular, > applications can choose timestamps that may be nonsensical for a given > application. One dangerous manifestation of this is the "doomstone" (a > tombstone far in the future of any realistic write). This feature would allow > either operators or users to specify a minimum and maximum timebound of > "reasonable" timestamps. The default would be negative infinity, positive > infinity to maintain backwards compatibility. Writes that are USING TIMESTAMP > with a timestamp outside of the timebox will see an exception. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org