[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2936?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13092165#comment-13092165
 ] 

Jonathan Ellis commented on CASSANDRA-2936:
-------------------------------------------

Agreed.  JDBC shouldn't need to care about sorting the columns, only presenting 
them back to the caller.

> improve dependency situation between JDBC driver and Cassandra
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-2936
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2936
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: API, Core
>    Affects Versions: 0.8.1
>            Reporter: Eric Evans
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: cql
>
> The JDBC jar currently depends on the {{apache-cassandra-$version}} jar, 
> despite the fact that it only (directly) uses a handful of Cassandra's 
> classes.  In a perfect world, we'd break those classes out into their own jar 
> which both the JDBC driver and Cassandra (ala 
> {{apache-cassandra-$version.jar}}) could depend on.  However, the classes 
> used directly don't fall out to anything that makes much sense 
> organizationally (short of creating a 
> {{apache-cassandra-misc-$version.jar}}), and the situation only gets worse 
> when you take into account all of the transitive dependencies.
> See CASSANDRA-2761 for more background, in particular 
> ([this|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2761?focusedCommentId=13048734&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13048734]
>  and 
> [this|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2761?focusedCommentId=13050884&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13050884])

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to