[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17719932#comment-17719932 ]
Caleb Rackliffe commented on CASSANDRA-18441: --------------------------------------------- Do we want to merge this and have CASSANDRA-18398 rebase, or the other way around? > Improvements to SSTable format configuration > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: CASSANDRA-18441 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18441 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Local/SSTable > Reporter: Branimir Lambov > Assignee: Jacek Lewandowski > Priority: Normal > Fix For: 5.x > > > CEP-17 and CASSANDRA-17056 abstracted some interfaces for SSTable format > implementations and defined a method of plugging in specific configurations. > This method is brittle and asks users to specify format identifiers whose > configuration does not provide value but can be the source of conflicts and > problems. On the other hand it makes important choices non-obvious, as the > selection of format to write is given by the order of configured interfaces. > An improved specification mechanism needs to be put in place before Cassandra > 5 is released. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org