[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17725114#comment-17725114
]
Caleb Rackliffe commented on CASSANDRA-18398:
---------------------------------------------
The rebase on CASSANDRA-18441 looks good, but there is one thing I'm a bit
worried about now:
{noformat}
# The default format is BIG, the legacy SSTable format in use since Cassandra
3.0.
# Cassandra versions 5.0 and later also support the trie-indexed BTI format,
# which offers better performance.
#sstable:
# selected_format: big
{noformat}
AFAICT, {{selected_format}} is case-sensitive. Combine this with the fact that
the inline docs here use all-caps, and someone could try to use BIG or BTI and
be a bit surprised that it doesn't work?
> CEP-25: Trie-indexed SSTable format
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-18398
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18398
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Local/SSTable
> Reporter: Branimir Lambov
> Assignee: Branimir Lambov
> Priority: Normal
> Fix For: 5.x
>
> Time Spent: 37h 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Implementation of Big Trie-Indexed (BTI) SSTable format, per
> [CEP-25|https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-25%3A+Trie-indexed+SSTable+format].
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org
