[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8272 ]


    Manish Khandelwal deleted comment on CASSANDRA-8272:
    ----------------------------------------------

was (Author: manmagic3):
Hi, reading the comments on this ticket indicates a performance hit for people 
using queries with "ALLOW FILTERING" with CL above One or Local_ONE. But I see 
this ticket fixed in Cassandra 3.11.7. When I upgraded to Cassandra 3.11.13, I 
did not see the dip in performance but after upgrading to Cassandra 4.0.x , I 
am seeing test cases using "ALLOW FILTERING" with CL LOCAL_QUORUM taking a hit. 
Is there something which only went in Cassandra 4.0.x and not in 3.11.7+. 

> 2ndary indexes can return stale data
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-8272
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8272
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Feature/2i Index
>            Reporter: Sylvain Lebresne
>            Assignee: Andres de la Peña
>            Priority: Normal
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 3.0.21, 3.11.7, 4.0-beta1, 4.0
>
>          Time Spent: 7h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> When replica return 2ndary index results, it's possible for a single replica 
> to return a stale result and that result will be sent back to the user, 
> potentially failing the CL contract.
> For instance, consider 3 replicas A, B and C, and the following situation:
> {noformat}
> CREATE TABLE test (k int PRIMARY KEY, v text);
> CREATE INDEX ON test(v);
> INSERT INTO test(k, v) VALUES (0, 'foo');
> {noformat}
> with every replica up to date. Now, suppose that the following queries are 
> done at {{QUORUM}}:
> {noformat}
> UPDATE test SET v = 'bar' WHERE k = 0;
> SELECT * FROM test WHERE v = 'foo';
> {noformat}
> then, if A and B acknowledge the insert but C respond to the read before 
> having applied the insert, then the now stale result will be returned (since 
> C will return it and A or B will return nothing).
> A potential solution would be that when we read a tombstone in the index (and 
> provided we make the index inherit the gcGrace of it's parent CF), instead of 
> skipping that tombstone, we'd insert in the result a corresponding range 
> tombstone.  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to