[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17780289#comment-17780289
 ] 

Stefan Miklosovic edited comment on CASSANDRA-18945 at 10/27/23 9:54 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

BTW, can't this still go to 5.0? I see the patch against trunk. I think that as 
long as there is not any 5.0.0 yet we can change UCS as we wish as it has never 
been released and it is natural to do these kind of patches in alphas.


was (Author: smiklosovic):
BTW, can't this still go to 5.0? I see the patch against trunk. I think that as 
long as there is not any 5.0.0 yet we can change UCS as we wish as it has never 
been released.

> Unified Compaction Strategy is creating too many sstables
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-18945
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18945
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Local/Compaction
>            Reporter: Branimir Lambov
>            Assignee: Ethan Brown
>            Priority: Normal
>             Fix For: 5.x
>
>         Attachments: file_ucs_shenandoah.html, file_ucs_shenandoah_3.html, 
> file_ucs_shenandoah_off_heap_memtable.html, 
> file_ucs_shenandoah_on_heap_memtable_2.html, 
> file_ucs_shenandoah_on_heap_memtable_3.html, key-value-oss.html
>
>          Time Spent: 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The unified compaction strategy currently aims to create sstables with close 
> to the same size, defaulting to 1 GiB. Unfortunately tests show that 
> Cassandra starts to have performance problems when the number of sstables 
> grows to the order of a thousand, and in particular that even 1 TiB of data 
> with the default configuration is creating too many sstables for efficient 
> processing. This matters even more for SAI, where the number of sstables in 
> the system can have a proportional effect on the complexity of operations.
> It is quite easy to create a configuration option that allows sstables to 
> take some part of the data growth by adding a multiplier to [the shard count 
> calculation|https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/trunk/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/db/compaction/UnifiedCompactionStrategy.md#sharding]
>  formula, replacing 
> {{2 ^ round(log2(d / (t * b))) * b}} 
> with 
> {{2 ^ round((1 - 𝜆) * log2(d / (t * b))) * b}}, 
> where 𝜆 is a parameter whose value is between 0 and 1.
> With this, a 𝜆 of 0.5 would mean that shard count and sstable size grow in 
> parallel at the square root of the data size growth. 0 would result in no 
> growth, and 1 in always using the same number of shards.
> It may also be valuable to introduce a threshold for engaging the base shard 
> count to avoid splitting lowest-level sstables into fragments that are too 
> small.
> Once both of these are in place, we can set defaults that better suit all 
> node densities, including 10 TiB and beyond, for example:
>  - target size of 1 GiB
>  - 𝜆 of 1/3
>  - base shard count of 4
>  - minimum size 100 MiB



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to