[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13104444#comment-13104444
 ] 

Sylvain Lebresne commented on CASSANDRA-3200:
---------------------------------------------

bq. Doesn't it require a lot more coordination between replicas?

No. For a given range and cf, we already wait to have all the trees for that 
range and cf before scheduling the streaming repair.

> Repair: compare all trees together (for a given range/cf) instead of by pair 
> in isolation
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-3200
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3200
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Sylvain Lebresne
>            Assignee: Sylvain Lebresne
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: repair
>             Fix For: 1.0.1
>
>
> Currently, repair compare merkle trees by pair, in isolation of any other 
> tree. What that means concretely is that if I have three node A, B and C 
> (RF=3) with A and B in sync, but C having some range r inconsitent with both 
> A and B (since those are consistent), we will do the following transfer of r: 
> A -> C, C -> A, B -> C, C -> B.
> The fact that we do both A -> C and C -> A is fine, because we cannot know 
> which one is more to date from A or C. However, the transfer B -> C is 
> useless provided we do A -> C if A and B are in sync. Not doing that transfer 
> will be a 25% improvement in that case. With RF=5 and only one node 
> inconsistent with all the others, that almost a 40% improvement, etc...
> Given that this situation of one node not in sync while the others are is 
> probably fairly common (one node died so it is behind), this could be a fair 
> improvement over what is transferred. In the case where we use repair to 
> rebuild completely a node, this will be a dramatic improvement, because it 
> will avoid the rebuilded node to get RF times the data it should get.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to