[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-19018?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17803386#comment-17803386
 ] 

Caleb Rackliffe edited comment on CASSANDRA-19018 at 1/5/24 2:58 AM:
---------------------------------------------------------------------

In terms of scope, the biggest thing I'm worried about right now is the case 
where we have a non-empty {{postIndexQueryFilter()}} which needs to be applied. 
Right now, I think it may only be safe to apply it when "strict" filtering is 
allowed.

Also, I think we have a bug where RFP doesn't alloy non-index filters during 
its post-filtering if we have even a non-tokenizing analyzer.

[~adelapena] I may need to catch up w/ you on these if/when you have a minute.

I think I'm going to have to expand the test matrix to look at the post-filter 
vs. indexed expressions issue at least...

Part of what brought these things to my attention was playing around w/ a fix 
based on the patch for this Jira for 19007 here: 
https://github.com/maedhroz/cassandra/pull/14


was (Author: maedhroz):
In terms of scope, the biggest thing I'm worried about right now is the case 
where we have a non-empty {{postIndexQueryFilter()}} which needs to be applied. 
Right now, I think it may only be safe to apply it when "strict" filtering is 
allowed.

Also, I think we have a bug where RFP doesn't alloy non-index filters during 
its post-filtering if we have even a non-tokenizing analyzer.

[~adelapena] I may need to catch up w/ you on these if/when you have a minute.

I think I'm going to have to expand the test matrix to look at the post-filter 
vs. indexed expressions issue at least...

> An SAI-specific mechanism to ensure consistency isn't violated for 
> multi-column (i.e. AND) queries at CL > ONE
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-19018
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-19018
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Consistency/Coordination, Feature/SAI
>            Reporter: Caleb Rackliffe
>            Assignee: Caleb Rackliffe
>            Priority: Normal
>             Fix For: 5.0-rc, 5.x
>
>          Time Spent: 3h 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> CASSANDRA-19007 is going to be where we add a guardrail around 
> filtering/index queries that use intersection/AND over partially updated 
> non-key columns. (ex. Restricting one clustering column and one normal column 
> does not cause a consistency problem, as primary keys cannot be partially 
> updated.) This issue exists to attempt to fix this specifically for SAI in 
> 5.0.x, as Accord will (last I checked) not be available until the 5.1 release.
> The SAI-specific version of the originally reported issue is this:
> {noformat}
> try (Cluster cluster = init(Cluster.build(2).withConfig(config -> 
> config.with(GOSSIP).with(NETWORK)).start()))
>         {
>             cluster.schemaChange(withKeyspace("CREATE TABLE %s.t (k int 
> PRIMARY KEY, a int, b int)"));
>             cluster.schemaChange(withKeyspace("CREATE INDEX ON %s.t(a) USING 
> 'sai'"));
>             cluster.schemaChange(withKeyspace("CREATE INDEX ON %s.t(b) USING 
> 'sai'"));
>             // insert a split row
>             cluster.get(1).executeInternal(withKeyspace("INSERT INTO %s.t(k, 
> a) VALUES (0, 1)"));
>             cluster.get(2).executeInternal(withKeyspace("INSERT INTO %s.t(k, 
> b) VALUES (0, 2)"));
>         // Uncomment this line and test succeeds w/ partial writes 
> completed...
>         //cluster.get(1).nodetoolResult("repair", 
> KEYSPACE).asserts().success();
>             String select = withKeyspace("SELECT * FROM %s.t WHERE a = 1 AND 
> b = 2");
>             Object[][] initialRows = cluster.coordinator(1).execute(select, 
> ConsistencyLevel.ALL);
>             assertRows(initialRows, row(0, 1, 2)); // not found!!
>         }
> {noformat}
> To make a long story short, the local SAI indexes are hiding local partial 
> matches from the coordinator that would combine there to form full matches. 
> Simple non-index filtering queries also suffer from this problem, but they 
> hide the partial matches in a different way. I'll outline a possible solution 
> for this in the comments that takes advantage of replica filtering protection 
> and the repaired/unrepaired datasets...and attempts to minimize the amount of 
> extra row data sent to the coordinator.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to