[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13114196#comment-13114196
 ] 

Mck SembWever commented on CASSANDRA-3150:
------------------------------------------

Yes i see now an CFRR that went to 600%. But it's still a long way from 
problematic.

My understanding of how the sampled keys is generated is it all happens when a 
sstable is read.
If a restart or a (manual) compact doesn't help, why did an upgrade help?

What can i investigate to provide more debug here?

> ColumnFormatRecordReader loops forever (StorageService.getSplits(..) out of 
> whack)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-3150
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3150
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Hadoop
>    Affects Versions: 0.8.4, 0.8.5
>            Reporter: Mck SembWever
>            Assignee: Mck SembWever
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 0.8.6
>
>         Attachments: CASSANDRA-3150.patch, Screenshot-Counters for 
> task_201109212019_1060_m_000029 - Mozilla Firefox.png, Screenshot-Hadoop map 
> task list for job_201109212019_1060 on cassandra01 - Mozilla Firefox.png, 
> attempt_201109071357_0044_m_003040_0.grep-get_range_slices.log
>
>
> From http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.cassandra.user/20039
> {quote}
> bq. Cassandra-0.8.4 w/ ByteOrderedPartitioner
> bq. CFIF's inputSplitSize=196608
> bq. 3 map tasks (from 4013) is still running after read 25 million rows.
> bq. Can this be a bug in StorageService.getSplits(..) ?
> getSplits looks pretty foolproof to me but I guess we'd need to add
> more debug logging to rule out a bug there for sure.
> I guess the main alternative would be a bug in the recordreader paging.
> {quote}

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to