[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-19676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17852321#comment-17852321
 ] 

Stefan Miklosovic commented on CASSANDRA-19676:
-----------------------------------------------

No worries [~samueldlightfoot], keep it delivering! I am planning to take a 
more holistic approach for this whole streams issue in a foreseeable future, 
you are very welcome to participate in that. 

> Stream processing for StorageProxy::updateCoordinatorWriteLatencyTableMetric
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-19676
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-19676
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Legacy/Core
>            Reporter: Sam Lightfoot
>            Assignee: Sam Lightfoot
>            Priority: Normal
>             Fix For: 5.0-rc, 5.x
>
>         Attachments: after.png, image-2024-06-02-17-25-25-071.png
>
>          Time Spent: 0.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> On profiling a write-heavy workload (90% writes) using easy-cass-stress, it 
> became very clear StorageProxy::updateCoordinatorWriteLatencyTableMetric was 
> a hot path that ~15% of the CPU cycles of 
> ModificationStatement::executeWithoutCondition were taken up by (see attached 
> async-profiler image).
> We should convert this stream to a simple for loop, as has been discussed 
> recently on the mail list.
> easy-cass-stress command:
> $ bin/easy-cass-stress run KeyValue -n 10m --maxwlat 10 -r 0.1 --rate 20000 
> --compaction twcs
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to