[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-20550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

David Capwell updated CASSANDRA-20550:
--------------------------------------
    Description: SAIUtil only checks the status for the indexes on node1, which 
knows that node2/node3 have completed the indexing... but doesn't confirm that 
node2 knows about node3 or that node3 knows about node2... this causes a flaky 
race condition where we start a query on node2, node2 then sees that node3 is 
still building the index (it isn't, this is based off gossip), so node2 rejects 
the query!  (was: In running 
org.apache.cassandra.distributed.test.cql3.MultiNodeTableWalkWithoutReadRepairTest
 in a repeat job (trying to do 100k seeds without error) I see that from time 
to time selects fail in cases like)

> AST fuzz tests can be flakey in multi node clusters due to ephemeral read 
> errors, should retry in these cases
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-20550
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-20550
>             Project: Apache Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Test/fuzz
>            Reporter: David Capwell
>            Assignee: David Capwell
>            Priority: Normal
>             Fix For: 5.x
>
>          Time Spent: 2h 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> SAIUtil only checks the status for the indexes on node1, which knows that 
> node2/node3 have completed the indexing... but doesn't confirm that node2 
> knows about node3 or that node3 knows about node2... this causes a flaky race 
> condition where we start a query on node2, node2 then sees that node3 is 
> still building the index (it isn't, this is based off gossip), so node2 
> rejects the query!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to