[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13177076#comment-13177076
 ] 

Radim Kolar commented on CASSANDRA-2893:
----------------------------------------

what is improvement over cassandra 1.0? Writes to same key in CF were atomic 
already. 

You mean that reader is now waiting until new data are written to row by writer 
instead of returning old data?
                
> Add row-level isolation
> -----------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-2893
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2893
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
>            Assignee: Sylvain Lebresne
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.1
>
>         Attachments: 0001-Move-deletion-infos-into-ISortedColumns-v2.patch, 
> 0001-Move-deletion-infos-into-ISortedColumns.patch, 
> 0002-Make-memtable-use-CF.addAll-v2.patch, 
> 0002-Make-memtable-use-CF.addAll.patch, 
> 0003-Add-AtomicSortedColumn-and-snapTree-v2.patch, 
> 0003-Add-AtomicSortedColumn-and-snapTree.patch, latency-plain.svg, 
> latency.svg, snaptree-0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
>
>
> This could be done using an the atomic ConcurrentMap operations from the 
> Memtable and something like http://code.google.com/p/pcollections/ to replace 
> the ConcurrentSkipListMap in ThreadSafeSortedColumns.  The trick is that 
> pcollections does not provide a SortedMap, so we probably need to write our 
> own.
> Googling [persistent sortedmap] I found 
> http://code.google.com/p/actord/source/browse/trunk/actord/src/main/scala/ff/collection
>  (in scala) and http://clojure.org/data_structures#Data Structures-Maps.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to