[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Vijay updated CASSANDRA-3772:
-----------------------------

    Attachment: 0001-CASSANDRA-3772-Test.patch

micro benchmark shows a lot better performance

testing size of: 200000
Test MD5
MD5 test completed @ 1506
Test Murmur3
Murmur3 test completed @ 781

Hi Dave, while reviewing the patch it looks like 
Murmur3Partitioner.hash 

{code}
hashBytes[1] = (byte) (bufferLong >> 48);
...
{code}

is kind of redundant to 

{code}
case 15: k2 ^= ((long) key.get(offset+14)) << 48
... 
{code}

Though i dont think it is going to cause any additional latency :)


                
> Evaluate Murmur3-based partitioner
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-3772
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3772
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
>            Assignee: Dave Brosius
>             Fix For: 1.2
>
>         Attachments: 0001-CASSANDRA-3772-Test.patch, MumPartitionerTest.docx, 
> hashed_partitioner.diff, hashed_partitioner_3.diff, try_murmur3.diff, 
> try_murmur3_2.diff
>
>
> MD5 is a relatively heavyweight hash to use when we don't need cryptographic 
> qualities, just a good output distribution.  Let's see how much overhead we 
> can save by using Murmur3 instead.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to