[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13485803#comment-13485803
 ] 

Aleksey Yeschenko commented on CASSANDRA-4868:
----------------------------------------------

As I understand it now, GRANT NO_ACCESS is meant to be a way to strip all 
permissions for the resource from a user. Otherwise I don't see why it's useful 
to have. Even there I'd rather have something like 'REVOKE ALL ACCESS' instead.
                
> When authorizing actions, check for NO_ACCESS permission first instead of 
> FULL_ACCESS
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-4868
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4868
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 1.1.6, 1.2.0 beta 1
>            Reporter: Aleksey Yeschenko
>            Assignee: Aleksey Yeschenko
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.1.7, 1.2.0 beta 2
>
>         Attachments: CASSANDRA-4868-1.1.txt, CASSANDRA-4868-1.2.txt
>
>
> When authorizing actions, check for NO_ACCESS permission first instead of 
> FULL_ACCESS (ClientState.hasAccess). This seems like a safer order to me.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to