[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4915?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13502785#comment-13502785
 ] 

Sylvain Lebresne commented on CASSANDRA-4915:
---------------------------------------------

bq. It looks like this is reading entire rows into memory

It does and I'm fine leaving that second part to later.
                
> CQL should prevent or warn about inefficient queries
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-4915
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4915
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 0.8.0
>            Reporter: Edward Capriolo
>            Assignee: Sylvain Lebresne
>             Fix For: 1.2.0 rc1
>
>         Attachments: 0001-4915.txt, 
> 0002-Allow-non-indexed-expr-with-ALLOW-FILTERING.txt
>
>
> When issuing a query like:
> {noformat}
> CREATE TABLE videos (
>   videoid uuid,
>   videoname varchar,
>   username varchar,
>   description varchar,
>   tags varchar,
>   upload_date timestamp,
>   PRIMARY KEY (videoid,videoname)
> );
> SELECT * FROM videos WHERE videoname = 'My funny cat';
> {noformat}
> Cassandra samples some data using get_range_slice and then applies the query.
> This is very confusing to me, because as an end user am not sure if the query 
> is fast because Cassandra is performing an optimized query (over an index, or 
> using a slicePredicate) or if cassandra is simple sampling some random rows 
> and returning me some results. 
> My suggestions:
> 1) force people to supply a LIMIT clause on any query that is going to
> page over get_range_slice
> 2) having some type of explain support so I can establish if this
> query will work in the
> I will champion suggestion 1) because CQL has put itself in a rather unique 
> un-sql like position by applying an automatic limit clause without the user 
> asking for them. I also do not believe the CQL language should let the user 
> issue queries that will not work as intended with "larger-then-auto-limit" 
> size data sets.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to