[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Michael Theroux updated CASSANDRA-5264:
---------------------------------------

    Affects Version/s: 1.1.9
    
> Nodetool ring is reporting incorrect Effective ownership after upgrading from 
> 1.1.2 -> 1.1.9
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-5264
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5264
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.1.9
>         Environment: Amazon AWS Linux, Large instance (8gig of RAM, ephemeral 
> storage).  12 Node cluster.  Replication Factor 3, all queries performed with 
> LOCAL_QUORUM
>            Reporter: Michael Theroux
>            Priority: Minor
>
> We upgraded from Cassandra 1.1.2 to 1.1.9 yesterday.  All indications are the 
> upgrade went well.  Repair works as expected, and all our data is available.  
> Performance is as good, if not better, than it was previously.  
> However, nodetool ring is reporting inconsistent and incorrect results.  This 
> was my ring information before the upgrade:
> Address         DC          Rack        Status State   Load            
> Effective-Ownership Token                                       
>                                                                               
>              Token(bytes[eaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa8])
> 10.0.4.22       us-east     1a          Up     Normal  77.75 GB        25.00% 
>              Token(bytes[00000000000000000000000000000001])
> 10.0.10.23      us-east     1d          Up   Normal  82.68 GB        25.00%   
>            Token(bytes[15555555555555555555555555555555])
> 10.0.8.20       us-east     1c          Up     Normal  81.72 GB        25.00% 
>              Token(bytes[2aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa])
> 10.0.4.23       us-east     1a          Up     Normal  82.65 GB        25.00% 
>              Token(bytes[40000000000000000000000000000000])
> 10.0.10.20      us-east     1d          Up     Normal  80.2 GB         25.00% 
>              Token(bytes[55555555555555555555555555555554])
> 10.0.8.23       us-east     1c          Up     Normal  77.06 GB        25.00% 
>              Token(bytes[6aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaac])
> 10.0.4.21       us-east     1a          Up     Normal  81.37 GB        25.00% 
>              Token(bytes[80000000000000000000000000000000])
> 10.0.10.24      us-east     1d          Up     Normal  83.37 GB        25.00% 
>              Token(bytes[95555555555555555555555555555558])
> 10.0.8.21       us-east     1c          Up     Normal  84.33 GB        25.00% 
>              Token(bytes[aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa8])
> 10.0.4.25       us-east     1a          Up     Normal  79.91 GB        25.00% 
>              Token(bytes[c0000000000000000000000000000000])
> 10.0.10.21      us-east     1d          Up     Normal  83.46 GB        25.00% 
>              Token(bytes[d5555555555555555555555555555558])
> 10.0.8.24       us-east     1c          Up     Normal  90.66 GB        25.00% 
>              Token(bytes[eaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa8])
> This is my ring information after the upgrade:
> 10.0.4.22       us-east     1a          Up     Normal  77.74 GB        99.89% 
>              Token(bytes[00000000000000000000000000000001])
> 10.0.10.23      us-east     1d          Up     Normal  82.82 GB        64.14% 
>              Token(bytes[15555555555555555555555555555555])
> 10.0.8.20       us-east     1c          Up     Normal  81.89 GB        30.55% 
>              Token(bytes[2aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa])
> 10.0.4.23       us-east     1a          Up     Normal  82.77 GB        0.04%  
>              Token(bytes[40000000000000000000000000000000])
> 10.0.10.20      us-east     1d          Up     Normal  80.32 GB        0.04%  
>              Token(bytes[55555555555555555555555555555554])
> 10.0.8.23       us-east     1c          Up     Normal  77.07 GB        0.04%  
>              Token(bytes[6aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaac])
> 10.0.4.21       us-east     1a          Up     Normal  81.35 GB        0.04%  
>              Token(bytes[80000000000000000000000000000000])
> 10.0.10.24      us-east     1d          Up     Normal  83.49 GB        0.04%  
>              Token(bytes[95555555555555555555555555555558])
> 10.0.8.21       us-east     1c          Up     Normal  84.47 GB        0.04%  
>              Token(bytes[aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa8])
> 10.0.4.25       us-east     1a          Up     Normal  80.11 GB        0.04%  
>              Token(bytes[c0000000000000000000000000000000])
> 10.0.10.21      us-east     1d          Up     Normal  83.5 GB         35.79% 
>              Token(bytes[d5555555555555555555555555555558])
> 10.0.8.24       us-east     1c          Up     Normal  90.72 GB        69.38% 
>              Token(bytes[eaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa8])
> We use ByteOrderedPartitioning (we hash our own keys), and as you can see 
> from above, were achieving a somewhat equal distribution of data amongst the 
> nodes.
> The node that always seems to own 99% of the keys is the node that I run 
> "nodetool ring" on.  Running "nodetool ring" on two of these nodes at the 
> same time resulted in:
> From 10.0.4.22:
> Address         DC          Rack        Status State Load            
> Effective-Ownership Token
> Token(bytes[eaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa8])
> 10.0.4.22       us-east     1a          Up     Normal  77.72 GB        99.89% 
> Token(bytes[00000000000000000000000000000001])
> 10.0.10.23      us-east     1d          Up     Normal  82.74 GB        64.13% 
> Token(bytes[15555555555555555555555555555555])
> 10.0.8.20       us-east     1c          Up     Normal  81.79 GB        30.55% 
> Token(bytes[2aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa])
> 10.0.4.23       us-east     1a          Up     Normal  82.66 GB        0.04% 
> Token(bytes[40000000000000000000000000000000])
> 10.0.10.20      us-east     1d          Up     Normal  80.21 GB        0.04% 
> Token(bytes[55555555555555555555555555555554])
> 10.0.8.23       us-east     1c          Up     Normal  77.07 GB        0.04% 
> Token(bytes[6aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaac])
> 10.0.4.21       us-east     1a          Up     Normal  81.38 GB        0.04% 
> Token(bytes[80000000000000000000000000000000])
> 10.0.10.24      us-east     1d          Up     Normal  83.43 GB        0.04% 
> Token(bytes[95555555555555555555555555555558])
> 10.0.8.21       us-east     1c          Up     Normal  84.42 GB        0.04% 
> Token(bytes[aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa8])
> 10.0.4.25       us-east     1a          Up     Normal  80.06 GB        0.04% 
> Token(bytes[c0000000000000000000000000000000])
> 10.0.10.21      us-east     1d          Up     Normal  83.49 GB        35.80% 
> Token(bytes[d5555555555555555555555555555558])
> 10.0.8.24       us-east     1c          Up     Normal  90.72 GB        69.37% 
> Token(bytes[eaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa8])
> From 10.0.8.23:
> Address         DC          Rack        Status State Load            
> Effective-Ownership Token
> Token(bytes[eaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa8])
> 10.0.4.22       us-east     1a          Up     Normal  77.72 GB        0.04% 
> Token(bytes[00000000000000000000000000000001])
> 10.0.10.23      us-east     1d          Up     Normal  82.78 GB        0.04% 
> Token(bytes[15555555555555555555555555555555])
> 10.0.8.20       us-east     1c          Up     Normal  81.79 GB        0.04% 
> Token(bytes[2aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa])
> 10.0.4.23       us-east     1a          Up     Normal  82.66 GB        33.84% 
> Token(bytes[40000000000000000000000000000000])
> 10.0.10.20      us-east     1d          Up     Normal  80.21 GB        67.51% 
> Token(bytes[55555555555555555555555555555554])
> 10.0.8.23       us-east     1c          Up     Normal  77.07 GB        99.89% 
> Token(bytes[6aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaac])
> 10.0.4.21       us-east     1a          Up     Normal  81.38 GB        66.09% 
> Token(bytes[80000000000000000000000000000000])
> 10.0.10.24      us-east     1d          Up     Normal  83.43 GB        32.41% 
> Token(bytes[95555555555555555555555555555558])
> 10.0.8.21       us-east     1c          Up     Normal  84.42 GB        0.04% 
> Token(bytes[aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa8])
> 10.0.4.25       us-east     1a          Up     Normal  80.06 GB        0.04% 
> Token(bytes[c0000000000000000000000000000000])
> 10.0.10.21      us-east     1d          Up     Normal  83.49 GB        0.04% 
> Token(bytes[d5555555555555555555555555555558])
> 10.0.8.24       us-east     1c          Up     Normal  90.72 GB        0.04% 
> Token(bytes[eaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa8])
> I did a little digging, and do see some changes to how cassandra calculates 
> the splits in 1.1.8 as part of CASSANDRA-4803 (StorageService.getSplits()), 
> although I'm not familiar enough to tell if its a cause.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to