[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13623787#comment-13623787 ]
Jonathan Ellis commented on CASSANDRA-4775: ------------------------------------------- bq. The implementation becomes a fair bit more complicated I'm not really sure about that. Both with this and the above design [1], we do have more complexity on read/reconcile, but we trade that for zero special cases at the storage engine, which is a huge win. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4775?focusedCommentId=13586715&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13586715 > Counters 2.0 > ------------ > > Key: CASSANDRA-4775 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4775 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: Core > Reporter: Arya Goudarzi > Assignee: Aleksey Yeschenko > Labels: counters > Fix For: 2.0 > > > The existing partitioned counters remain a source of frustration for most > users almost two years after being introduced. The remaining problems are > inherent in the design, not something that can be fixed given enough > time/eyeballs. > Ideally a solution would give us > - similar performance > - less special cases in the code > - potential for a retry mechanism -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira