[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13642705#comment-13642705
 ] 

Marcus Eriksson commented on CASSANDRA-5511:
--------------------------------------------

* we can remove Directories.sstablesNeedMigration(...) (and related)
* remove DefsTable.fixSchemaNanoTimestamps()
* SystemTable.upgradeSystemData() can be cleaned up (LocationInfo is gone in 
1.2 right?)
* Remove SystemTable.OLD_STATUS_CF and SystemTable.OLD_HINTS_CF
* CFMetaData has a bunch of @Deprecated fields that can probably be removed.
* Nit: remove sstable.decorateKey(..) and use 
sstable.partitioner.decorateKey(...) everywhere
* why keep _SHA in FilterFactory.Type? (couldnt find any .ordinal() use)
* Do we use MURMUR2 anywhere?
* I guess we can remove everything testing "version < 
MessagingService.VERSION_12" (or throw appropriate exceptions etc)

                
> Clean up backwards compatibility complexity for 2.0
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-5511
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5511
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
>            Assignee: Jonathan Ellis
>             Fix For: 2.0
>
>         Attachments: CASSANDRA-5511-on_1.2.patch, 
> CASSANDRA-5511-on_trunk.patch
>
>
> We've supported rolling upgrades (network-compatible for read/write 
> operations) for several releases, but both 1.0 -> 1.1 and 1.1 -> 1.2 required 
> being on a recent release of the immediately prior major series for this to 
> work as desired.
> Meanwhile, we still support reading sstables at least back to 0.6 and 
> possibly even earlier.  This makes dealing with changes to the sstable quite 
> challenging; the recently written-and-reverted CASSANDRA-5487 comes to mind.
> 2.0 is a good place to drop support for sstables older than 1.2.5.  Our 
> experience with network compatibility demonstrates that this is not an 
> unreasonable burden to impose, and the major version number change suggests 
> that this is a logical time to make such a change.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to