[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5933?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13756323#comment-13756323 ]
Vijay commented on CASSANDRA-5933: ---------------------------------- Ryan, Do you mind testing the custom with 5 to 10 ms... I am thinking, we might need enough sample for Percentiles to make more sense (if conformed we might want to wait till the samples arrive etc). > 2.0 read performance is slower than 1.2 > --------------------------------------- > > Key: CASSANDRA-5933 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5933 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Ryan McGuire > Attachments: 1.2-faster-than-2.0.png, 1.2-faster-than-2.0-stats.png > > > Over the course of several tests I have observed that 2.0 read performance is > noticeably slower than 1.2 > Example: > Blue line is 1.2, the rest are various forms of 2.0 rc1 (I've also seen this > on rc2, just don't have a good graph handy) > !1.2-faster-than-2.0.png! > !1.2-faster-than-2.0-stats.png! > [See test data > here|http://ryanmcguire.info/ds/graph/graph.html?stats=stats.eager_retry.node_killed.json&metric=interval_op_rate&operation=stress-read&smoothing=1] -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira