[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13791547#comment-13791547
]
Jonathan Ellis commented on CASSANDRA-4338:
-------------------------------------------
Ryan, can you also test on a single node?
If the single-node improvements are still swamped by the network overhead...
but if we can reduce that with some of the other efforts going on
(CASSANDRA-1632, CASSANDRA-4718) then local performance will matter more.
But if Ryan doesn't see much difference on a single node either then we should
figure out what the environment difference is.
> Experiment with direct buffer in SequentialWriter
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-4338
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4338
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
> Assignee: Marcus Eriksson
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: performance
> Fix For: 2.1
>
> Attachments: 4338.benchmark.png, 4338.benchmark.snappycompressor.png,
> 4338-gc.tar.gz, gc-4338-patched.png, gc-trunk-me.png, gc-trunk.png,
> gc-with-patch-me.png
>
>
> Using a direct buffer instead of a heap-based byte[] should let us avoid a
> copy into native memory when we flush the buffer.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
