[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13855778#comment-13855778
 ] 

Donald Smith commented on CASSANDRA-5351:
-----------------------------------------

As reported in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5220, we ran 
"nodetool repair" on a 3-node cassandra v. 2.0.3 cluster using production 
hardware, on realistic test data. Each node has about 1TB of data. After over 
five days, the repair job is still running.

> Avoid repairing already-repaired data by default
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-5351
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5351
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
>            Assignee: Lyuben Todorov
>              Labels: repair
>             Fix For: 2.1
>
>
> Repair has always built its merkle tree from all the data in a columnfamily, 
> which is guaranteed to work but is inefficient.
> We can improve this by remembering which sstables have already been 
> successfully repaired, and only repairing sstables new since the last repair. 
>  (This automatically makes CASSANDRA-3362 much less of a problem too.)
> The tricky part is, compaction will (if not taught otherwise) mix repaired 
> data together with non-repaired.  So we should segregate unrepaired sstables 
> from the repaired ones.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Reply via email to