[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13923180#comment-13923180
]
Pavel Yaskevich commented on CASSANDRA-6689:
--------------------------------------------
Can we do a comparison between Netty and the one that we have in the patch? If
Netty proves to be better I would volunteer to refactor our code so we can
switch to Netty 4.x and get that allocator from there, one more useful thing is
that it already has far better ByteBuf implementation comparing to ByteBuffer
shipped with JDK so we don't have to do anything Native* on our side.
> Partially Off Heap Memtables
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-6689
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6689
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Benedict
> Assignee: Benedict
> Fix For: 2.1 beta2
>
> Attachments: CASSANDRA-6689-small-changes.patch
>
>
> Move the contents of ByteBuffers off-heap for records written to a memtable.
> (See comments for details)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
