[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13977707#comment-13977707
 ] 

Ryan McGuire commented on CASSANDRA-7031:
-----------------------------------------

[~benedict] - here's some graphs:

[write n=25000000 -key populate=1..10000 -rate threads=50 -mode 
thrift|http://riptano.github.io/cassandra_performance/graph_v3/graph.html?stats=stats.7031.populate_1_10000.json]

[write n=25000000 -key populate=1..1000000 -rate threads=50 -mode 
thrift|http://riptano.github.io/cassandra_performance/graph_v3/graph.html?stats=stats.7031.populate_1_1000000.json]

> Increase default commit log total space + segment size
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-7031
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7031
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Benedict
>            Assignee: Benedict
>            Priority: Trivial
>             Fix For: 2.1 beta2
>
>         Attachments: 7031.txt
>
>
> I would like to increase the default commit log total space and segment size 
> options for 64-bit JVMs:
> The current default of 1Gb and 32Mb is quite constrained and can have some 
> (very minor) negative performance implications, for no major benefit: 
> # 32Mb files are actually quite small, and if during the 10s interval we have 
> completely filled multiple of them (quite easy) it would be more efficient to 
> write fewer larger files, as we can issue fewer fsyncs and permit the OS to 
> schedule the writes more efficiently. On my box this has a small but 
> noticeable impact. Although I would expect on decent server hardware this 
> would be smaller still, since we immediately drop the pages from cache on 
> writing there isn't a great deal of advantage to keeping the files so small. 
> The only advantage I can see is that during a drop KS/CF or other event that 
> forces log rollover we're wasting less space until log recycling. 128-256Mb 
> are modest increases that seem more appropriate to me.
> # 1Gb is too small for the default total log space. We can find that we force 
> memtable flushes as a result of log utilisation instead of memtable occupancy 
> quite often (esp. as a result of increased effective memtable space from 
> recent improvements), especially on machines with more addressable memory. I 
> suggest 8Gb as a minimum. The only disadvantage of having more log data is 
> that replay on restart may be slightly slower, but since most of the events 
> will be ignored it should be relatively benign, and I would rather take the 
> penalty on startup instead of during running, no matter how small the running 
> penalty.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to