[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14026475#comment-14026475
 ] 

Jason Brown edited comment on CASSANDRA-6890 at 6/10/14 3:35 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Hmm, are we sure we really want to do this before CASSANDRA-5863 is proven (or 
even implemented)? The v1 patch is simple enough, but we are taking a known 
performance hit against an unknown future payoff. How much simpler would 
removing the mmap path make implementing CASSANDRA-5863? I can't imagine it'd 
make that much of a difference?

Furthermore, if anyone is truly interested, I'll be talking about direct i/o 
(O_DIRECT) at the 2014 NGCC this week. 


was (Author: jasobrown):
Hmm, are we sure we really want to do this before CASSANDRA-5863 is proven (or 
even implemented)? The v1 patch is simple enough, but we are taking a known 
performance hit against an unknown future payoff. How much simpler would 
removing the mmap path make implementing CASSANDRA-5863? I can't imagine it'd 
make that much of a difference?

Furthermore, if anyone is truly interested, I'll be talking about direct i/o 
(O_DIRECT) at the 2014 NGCC. 

> Standardize on a single read path
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-6890
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6890
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Joshua McKenzie
>            Assignee: Joshua McKenzie
>              Labels: performance
>             Fix For: 3.0
>
>         Attachments: 6890_v1.txt, mmap_gc.jpg, mmap_jstat.txt, mmap_perf.txt, 
> nommap_gc.jpg, nommap_jstat.txt
>
>
> Since we actively unmap unreferenced SSTR's and also copy data out of those 
> readers on the read path, the current memory mapped i/o is a lot of 
> complexity for very little payoff.  Clean out the mmapp'ed i/o on the read 
> path.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to