[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Benedict updated CASSANDRA-7546:
--------------------------------

    Attachment: 7546.20.txt

Attaching my suggested alternative approach, which I think is a little simpler 
to reason about: if we loop for any reason we immediately take the monitor, if 
unsafe is available to us; if it isn't we don't benefit from the optimisation. 
We don't change the logic for updating, as taking the monitor doesn't guarantee 
we have exclusive access, it only guarantees we have exclusive access versus 
those writes that have themselves spun once, thereby capping the amount of 
competition.

For 2.1 I suggest sticking with the same approach, then in 3.0/.1 we'll take a 
look at the more complex approach of making writes lazy under competition.

> AtomicSortedColumns.addAllWithSizeDelta has a spin loop that allocates memory
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-7546
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7546
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: graham sanderson
>            Assignee: graham sanderson
>         Attachments: 7546.20.txt, suggestion1.txt, suggestion1_21.txt
>
>
> In order to preserve atomicity, this code attempts to read, clone/update, 
> then CAS the state of the partition.
> Under heavy contention for updating a single partition this can cause some 
> fairly staggering memory growth (the more cores on your machine the worst it 
> gets).
> Whilst many usage patterns don't do highly concurrent updates to the same 
> partition, hinting today, does, and in this case wild (order(s) of magnitude 
> more than expected) memory allocation rates can be seen (especially when the 
> updates being hinted are small updates to different partitions which can 
> happen very fast on their own) - see CASSANDRA-7545
> It would be best to eliminate/reduce/limit the spinning memory allocation 
> whilst not slowing down the very common un-contended case.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to