Sylvain Lebresne created CASSANDRA-7857:
-------------------------------------------

             Summary: Ability to froze UDT
                 Key: CASSANDRA-7857
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7857
             Project: Cassandra
          Issue Type: Improvement
            Reporter: Sylvain Lebresne
            Assignee: Sylvain Lebresne
             Fix For: 2.1.0



Currently, UDT are serialized into a single value. For 3.0, we want to change 
that somewhat and allow updating individual subfields: CASSANDRA-7423 (and 
ultimately, we'll probably allow querying subpart of UDT to some extend). Also 
for 3.0, we want to allow some nesting of collections (CASSANDRA-7826).

However, migrating the currently serialized UDT would be challenging. Besides 
that, even with nested collections, we probably won't be able to support 
nesting within map keys and sets without serializing (at the very least, not 
initially). Also, it can be useful in some specific case to have UDT or 
collections for PK columns, even if those are serialized.

So we need a better way to distinguish when a composite types (collections & 
UDT) are serialized (which imply you can't update subpart of the value, you 
have to rewrite it fully) and when they are not. The suggestion is then to 
introduce a new keyword, {{frozen}}, to indicate that a type is serialized:
{noformat}
CREATE TYPE foo (a int, b int);
CREATE TABLE bar (
    k frozen<foo> PRIMARY KEY,
    m map<frozen<set<int>>, text>
)
{noformat}
A big advantage is that it makes the downside (you can't update the value 
without rewriting it all) clear and upfront.

Now, as of 2.1, we only support frozen UDT, and so we should make this clear by 
1) adding the frozen keyword and 2) don't allow use of UDT unless they are 
"frozen" (since that's all we really support). This is what this ticket 
proposes to do. And this should be done in 2.1.0 or this will be a breaking 
change.

We will have a follow-up ticket that will extend {{frozen}} to collection, but 
this is less urgent since this will be strictly an improvement.

I'll note that in term of syntax, {{serialized}} was suggested as an 
alternative to {{frozen}}. I personally have a minor preference for 
{{serialized}} but it was argued that it had a "sequential" connotation which 
{{frozen}} don't have. Changing that is still up for discussion, but we need to 
reach a decision quickly.





--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to