[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14125124#comment-14125124
 ] 

Benedict commented on CASSANDRA-7519:
-------------------------------------

There were no merge conflicts from 2.1.0->2.1, so I missed this. I've ninja 
fixed.

I haven't resolved the ticket because, whilst it's been committed to 2.1.0, 
it's unclear if it will be pushed back to 2.1.1 since the RC is up for vote. So 
the fixVersion is unknown.

> Further stress improvements to generate more realistic workloads
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-7519
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7519
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Tools
>            Reporter: Benedict
>            Assignee: Benedict
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: tools
>             Fix For: 2.1.1
>
>
> We generally believe that the most common workload is for reads to 
> exponentially prefer most recently written data. However as stress currently 
> behaves we have two id generation modes: sequential and random (although 
> random can be distributed). I propose introducing a new mode which is 
> somewhat like sequential, except we essentially 'look back' from the current 
> id by some amount defined by a distribution. I may possibly make the position 
> only increment as it's first written to also, so that this mode can be run 
> from a clean slate with a mixed workload. This should allow is to generate 
> workloads that are more representative.
> At the same time, I will introduce a timestamp value generator for primary 
> key columns that is strictly ascending, i.e. has some random component but is 
> based off of the actual system time (or some shared monotonically increasing 
> state) so that we can again generate a more realistic workload. This may be 
> challenging to tie in with the new procedurally generated partitions, but I'm 
> sure it can be done without too much difficulty.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to