[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14125698#comment-14125698
 ] 

graham sanderson edited comment on CASSANDRA-7849 at 9/8/14 4:05 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------------

# So the vote is to change all logging from this class to debug?
# We should probably add something to NEWS.txt don't you think, about turning 
on debugging for the class to debug network issues or binary client driver 
problems
#* Do I do that as part of the patch?



was (Author: graham sanderson):
# So the vote is to change all logging from this class to debug?
# We should probably add something to NEWS.txt don't you think, about turning 
on debugging for the class to debug network issues or binary client driver 
problems
#* Do I do that as part of the patch


> Server logged error messages (in binary protocol) for unexpected exceptions 
> could be more helpful
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-7849
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7849
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: graham sanderson
>             Fix For: 1.2.19, 2.0.11
>
>         Attachments: cassandra-1.2-7849.txt
>
>
> From time to time (actually quite frequently) we get error messages in the 
> server logs like this
> {code}
> ERROR [Native-Transport-Requests:288] 2014-08-29 04:48:07,118 
> ErrorMessage.java (line 222) Unexpected exception during request
> java.io.IOException: Connection reset by peer
>         at sun.nio.ch.FileDispatcherImpl.read0(Native Method)
>         at sun.nio.ch.SocketDispatcher.read(SocketDispatcher.java:39)
>         at sun.nio.ch.IOUtil.readIntoNativeBuffer(IOUtil.java:223)
>         at sun.nio.ch.IOUtil.read(IOUtil.java:192)
>         at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.read(SocketChannelImpl.java:379)
>         at 
> org.jboss.netty.channel.socket.nio.NioWorker.read(NioWorker.java:64)
>         at 
> org.jboss.netty.channel.socket.nio.AbstractNioWorker.process(AbstractNioWorker.java:109)
>         at 
> org.jboss.netty.channel.socket.nio.AbstractNioSelector.run(AbstractNioSelector.java:312)
>         at 
> org.jboss.netty.channel.socket.nio.AbstractNioWorker.run(AbstractNioWorker.java:90)
>         at 
> org.jboss.netty.channel.socket.nio.NioWorker.run(NioWorker.java:178)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {code}
> These particular cases are almost certainly problems with the client driver, 
> client machine, client process, however after the fact this particular 
> exception is practically impossible to debug because there is no indication 
> in the underlying JVM/netty exception of who the peer was. I should note we 
> have lots of different types of applications running against the cluster so 
> it is very hard to correlate these to anything



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to