[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14132979#comment-14132979
]
Benedict commented on CASSANDRA-7919:
-------------------------------------
bq. a given client process will have one lsb for its lifetime.
Sure, but when discussing state space we have to assume applications lifecycle
periodically :-)
bq. I don't have a problem with that.
Ok, if we can agree to that, fix the LSB and make clear to users they should
not connect through NAT, I think that's all of my concerns mostly dealt with.
This will still be more annoying to store, but surmountable without severe loss
of efficiency.
> Change timestamp representation to timeuuid
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-7919
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7919
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: T Jake Luciani
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.0
>
>
> In order to overcome some of the issues with timestamps (CASSANDRA-6123) we
> need to migrate to a better timestamp representation for cells.
> Since drivers already support timeuuid it makes sense to migrate to this
> internally (see CASSANDRA-7056)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
