[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAY-2881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrus Adamchik updated CAY-2881:
---------------------------------
Summary: Switch to standard JDBC approach to read/write java.time classes
(was: Switch to standard JDBC way to read/write java.time classes)
> Switch to standard JDBC approach to read/write java.time classes
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAY-2881
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAY-2881
> Project: Cayenne
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Andrus Adamchik
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 5.0-M2
>
>
> On most databases, we no longer need ValueObjectTypes for java.time classes,
> as demonstrated by CAY-2701 for modern MySQL (also see
> https://dev.mysql.com/blog-archive/support-for-date-time-types-in-connector-j-8-0/
> ) . So let's make the approach in CAY-2701 the default in Cayenne, and then
> test and see what databases DO NOT support it, and create custom
> ExtendedTypes for those.
> Of course, as a result MySQLLocalDateTimeType will no longer be needed,
> superseded by the standard ExtendedTypes.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
