avamingli commented on code in PR #1257:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudberry/pull/1257#discussion_r2231036624


##########
src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c:
##########
@@ -99,8 +101,43 @@ static TupleTableSlot 
*ExecPrepareTupleRouting(ModifyTableState *mtstate,
                                                                                
           TupleTableSlot *slot,
                                                                                
           ResultRelInfo **partRelInfo);
 
+typedef struct ModifiedLeafRelidsKey
+{
+       CmdType cmd;
+       Oid             relid;
+
+} ModifiedLeafRelidsKey;
+
+typedef struct ModifiedLeafRelidsData
+{
+       ModifiedLeafRelidsKey   key;
+} ModifiedLeafRelidsData;
+
+static uint32
+modified_leaf_hash(const void *key, Size keysize)
+{
+       Assert(keysize == sizeof(ModifiedLeafRelidsKey));
+       return DatumGetUInt32(hash_any((const unsigned char*) key,

Review Comment:
   Hmm… that seems unnecessary—no standard hash functions work that way. I 
don’t plan to spend more time on this; the current code is good enough as is. 
Most of these don’t even include assertions anyway.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cloudberry.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cloudberry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cloudberry.apache.org

Reply via email to