GutoVeronezi commented on PR #7131:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7131#issuecomment-1513618184

   > > @DaanHoogland, can we do another round of tests on this one?
   > 
   > yes of course. but I get a bit worried about the unfinished discussions on 
the subject. Also extensive multi platform testing by as many setups as 
possible , not just the test matrix, will be needed.
   
   @DaanHoogland, I agree more evidence will help us on guaranteeing the 
platform's functionality; if someone else could test this patch to generate 
more evidence, it would be great.
   
   Regarding the subjects @rohityadavcloud raised, IMHO @JoaoJandre's answers 
are coherent; however, if there are any points missing, let's discuss them. Let 
me know what is missing, and then we can coordinate on how to improve them to 
you guys.
   
   > @GutoVeronezi @JoaoJandre I think we are far from done with this one. 
There are so many ways this can go wrong in so many envireonments. I hope you 
have the stamina to see it through. 
   
   We have been farther :smile:. The community has been discussing this topic 
for about 8 years now (since 2015); therefore, it is interesting to finally get 
it off the drawing and discussing, and that is what we are doing here. We have 
been putting months of effort towards this end. The goal is to finally upgrade 
ACS log library and to move on to use energy with more and better things in 
ACS. From my experience with Log4j2, I can say it will help us a lot while 
coding and troubleshooting.
   
   @DaanHoogland do you have any clues on why the Trillian builds are failing?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to