DaanHoogland commented on issue #8899: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/8899#issuecomment-2090094946
> Well my idea would be the 2 points from the "Expected results", either it is done in sequence OR the storage pool are refcounted. @rp- , - I do not like the in sequence idea as this is storage being copied over network this will no doubt be a performance hog. - keeping a mount-count could work, meaning that the SSVM would have to keep a tally of how many requests are using a certain mount, and on umount just returning success without action when the count is not zero. Only to really un-mount once the it is. One catcha is that the mount functionality must be centralised and may not be called by commands, but only requested. If we guarantee this it will work as you describe €0,02 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
