weizhouapache commented on PR #12758: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/12758#issuecomment-4126979022
> Hello, @abh1sar, @DaanHoogland, @weizhouapache, @yadvr, @vishesh92, and anyone interested > > To put a nail on the backup provider name, since KVM Native Incremental Backup is not ok according to you guys, could you tell me which provider name you think is most appropriate? > > 1. ACS KVM Backup Engine > 2. ACS KVM Backup Service > 3. KVM Incremental Backup Engine > 4. KVM Incremental Backup Service > 5. KVM Backup Engine > 6. KVM Backup Service > 7. ACS Embedded KVM Backup Engine > > If no opinion is given in the next week (Lazy consensus from the Apache Way), I will set the name as ACS KVM Backup Engine. @JoaoJandre Thanks for the follow-ups. First, I think incremental backup is a valuable feature of the solution, but it may not be ideal to highlight it in the title. It is, or will be supported by most backup solutions. Second, it would be better to emphasize that secondary storage is used as the backup repository. With that in mind, a title such as “KVM VM Backup on Secondary Storage” could be more appropriate I think. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
