Damans227 commented on code in PR #13856:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/13856#discussion_r4231094279


##########
engine/schema/src/main/resources/META-INF/db/schema-42210to42220.sql:
##########
@@ -18,3 +18,32 @@
 --;
 -- Schema upgrade from 4.22.1.0 to 4.22.2.0
 --;
+
+-- Composite index on nics(instance_id, removed) to fix wrong-index pick in 
user_vm_view.
+-- The optimizer picks i_nics__removed over fk_nics__instance_id for the
+-- LEFT JOIN nics ON (vm_instance.id = nics.instance_id AND nics.removed IS 
NULL)
+-- because neither single-column index covers both predicates.
+CALL `cloud`.`IDEMPOTENT_ADD_INDEX`('i_nics__instance_id_removed', 
'cloud.nics', '(instance_id, removed)');
+-- account_view performance: covers all 10 resource_limit LEFT JOINs
+-- which filter on (account_id = ? AND type = ? AND tag IS NULL)
+CALL `cloud`.`IDEMPOTENT_ADD_INDEX`('i_resource_limit__acct_type_tag', 
'cloud.resource_limit', '(account_id, type, tag)');
+-- account_vmstats_view: enables index-only scan for GROUP BY account_id, state
+-- WHERE vm_type = 'User' AND removed IS NULL
+CALL `cloud`.`IDEMPOTENT_ADD_INDEX`('i_vm_instance__account_id_state', 
'cloud.vm_instance', '(account_id, state)');
+-- free_ip_view: covers WHERE state = 'Free' JOIN vlan ON vlan.id = vlan_db_id
+CALL `cloud`.`IDEMPOTENT_ADD_INDEX`('i_user_ip_address__state_vlan', 
'cloud.user_ip_address', '(state, vlan_db_id)');
+-- Prometheus/AlertManager IP count queries: covers WHERE data_center_id = ? 
AND removed IS NULL
+CALL `cloud`.`IDEMPOTENT_ADD_INDEX`('i_user_ip_address__dc_removed_vlan', 
'cloud.user_ip_address', '(data_center_id, removed, vlan_db_id)');
+-- event table: compound index for frequent Compute API queries
+-- (WHERE archived = 0 AND level = ? ORDER BY created)
+CALL `cloud`.`IDEMPOTENT_ADD_INDEX`('i_event__archived_level_created', 
'cloud.event', '(archived, level, created)');
+-- event table: default listEvents path (account + archived + sort)
+CALL `cloud`.`IDEMPOTENT_ADD_INDEX`('i_event__account_archived_created', 
'cloud.event', '(account_id, archived, created DESC)');

Review Comment:
   should we drop the old account id and archived indexes on the event table? 
the new ones cover them and this table gets a write on almost every action



##########
engine/schema/src/main/resources/META-INF/db/procedures/cloud.idempotent_add_index.sql:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+-- Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+-- or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+-- distributed with this work for additional information
+-- regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+-- to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+-- "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+-- with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+--
+--   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+--
+-- Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+-- software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+-- "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+-- KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+-- specific language governing permissions and limitations
+-- under the License.
+
+-- Idempotent ADD INDEX
+DROP PROCEDURE IF EXISTS `cloud`.`IDEMPOTENT_ADD_INDEX`;
+CREATE PROCEDURE `cloud`.`IDEMPOTENT_ADD_INDEX` (

Review Comment:
   can we reuse the existing IDEMPOTENT_ADD_KEY here? looks like the only 
difference is the online lock option



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to