rafaelweingartner commented on issue #2514: [CLOUDSTACK-10346] Problem with NAT configuration and VMs not accessing each other via public IPs URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2514#issuecomment-382498868 The first time when I saw this `throw` clause in the @ustcweizhou comments, I googled and I found this: > throw - a special control route used together with policy rules. If such a route is selected, lookup in this table is terminated pretending that no route was found. Without policy routing it is equivalent to the absence of the route in the routing table. The packets are dropped and the ICMP message net unreachable is generated. The local senders get an ENETUNREACH error. That is why I said I do not understand how that `throw` option can solve the NAT translation that we are having
---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
