slavkap commented on a change in pull request #3724: Storage-based Snapshots for KVM VMs URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3724#discussion_r366356280
########## File path: plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/main/java/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/storage/KVMStorageProcessor.java ########## @@ -1456,22 +1496,65 @@ public Answer createSnapshot(final CreateObjectCommand cmd) { final KVMPhysicalDisk disk = storagePoolMgr.getPhysicalDisk(primaryStore.getPoolType(), primaryStore.getUuid(), volume.getPath()); if (state == DomainInfo.DomainState.VIR_DOMAIN_RUNNING && !primaryPool.isExternalSnapshot()) { final String vmUuid = vm.getUUIDString(); - final Object[] args = new Object[] {snapshotName, vmUuid}; - final String snapshot = SnapshotXML.format(args); + boolean isKVMEnabled = cmd.getContextParam("kvmsnapshot") != null ? Boolean.parseBoolean(cmd.getContextParam("kvmsnapshot")) : false; + s_logger.debug(String.format("Snapshots on KVM is enabled %s", isKVMEnabled)); + if (isKVMEnabled) { + long size = 0; + OutputInterpreter.OneLineParser parser = new OutputInterpreter.OneLineParser(); + Script sc = new Script("virsh"); + sc.add(String.format("qemu-monitor-command %s '{ \"execute\" : \"query-block\" }'", vmName)); Review comment: Thanks @wido for the comments! We will check what will be needed for the patch, and we will start working on it. We will ask for help, if we get stuck somewhere. Could you please give me and example why "executing commands is just not reliable enough"? And if there are a problems with commands execution whether there will be the same with execution of virsh in helper scripts? ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services