[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17278822#comment-17278822
]
Steve Lawrence commented on DAFFODIL-1605:
------------------------------------------
The Apache Maturity Model for Daffodil is completed here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DAFFODIL/Apache+Daffodil+Maturity+Model+Assessment
I don't think we gain much value from maintaining both, and Apache model is
preferred.
> Update Wiki based on CII best practices review
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DAFFODIL-1605
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1605
> Project: Daffodil
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Documentation, Infrastructure
> Reporter: Mike Beckerle
> Priority: Minor
>
> See
> https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/projects/357
> The self-certification questionnaire should also be reviewed. MikeB filled it
> in, but guessed on a few things that seemed not applicable, but didn't have
> N/A as a choice.
> Since they gave us 100% rating (despite fuzz testing issue below), I dropped
> their badge on our wiki front page, but removed it pending review by Steve
> Lawrence of the questionnaire answers.
> Also JIRA DFDL-1602. The above self-certification questionnaire reminded me
> that we're not doing fuzz testing but clearly we should. They gave us 100%
> rating anyway, even though this fuzz testing requirement was listed as "not
> met", but this is also based on some guesses on my part about a few of the
> other questionnaire answers.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
